A White Rock resident calls the federal-backed pier upgrades a “sad waste” of tax dollars, arguing the project lacks financial returns.
White Rock, B.C. A recent letter to the editor in Peace Arch News has ignited a debate over the city’s plan to spend taxpayer money to make the iconic White Rock Pier earthquake-resistant. The writer publicly criticized the proposed upgrades as financially irresponsible and out of touch with community priorities.
What the Letter Says
The author expresses frustration with Prime Minister Mark Carney and MP Ernie Klassen, claiming that taxpayer dollars are being directed toward a pier that “creates no revenue and adds nothing to the waterfront.” They argue that there are more pressing needs in White Rock than reinforcing a pier questioning whether the structure should be a top priority for government spending.
The writer goes on to call the investment a “sad waste” of public money, suggesting the decision reflects a misalignment between elected officials and the everyday concerns of residents.
Why This Is a Big Deal Locally
1. Cost and Funding Questions
White Rock’s pier has long been a landmark but making it earthquake-proof is a major expense. While the 2025 federal budget includes funding for pier upgrades, the exact dollar amount has not been disclosed.
2. City Finances Under Pressure
Some residents feel the pier project is being prioritized despite other infrastructure needs. An earlier White Rock council meeting showed concern about capital budgeting and how reserve funds are allocated. Meanwhile, raising taxes is already a sensitive issue — a recent city discussion acknowledged a projected property tax increase.
3. Public Sentiment Divided
On one side, many view the pier as a historic community icon worth preserving. On the other, critics argue it’s not a revenue-generating asset calling into question whether spending millions on upgrades is the best use of limited taxpayer funds.
Broader Implications
This debate taps into larger questions about public infrastructure priorities in small communities. Should tax money go toward preserving landmarks with sentimental value, or should it address more functional and revenue-generating projects?
For White Rock, the pier is more than a tourist attraction it’s part of the town’s identity. But as this letter shows, not all residents are convinced that identity should come at the cost of their wallets.
Stay updated instantly — follow us on Instagram | Facebook | X
Leave a comment