Parole Board Again Blocks Release of Convicted Killer
A man convicted in the 2010 murder of an 18-year-old Vancouver Island woman has had his application for full parole turned down once more. The Parole Board of Canada ruled that he still poses an undue risk to society, continuing a long legal process that reflects serious concerns about public safety.
Background of Crime and Convictions
In March 2010, Kimberly Proctor, a teenager from Langford, was lured to a home by two young men, where she was sexually assaulted and killed. The body of Proctor was later found beneath a bridge and badly burned. Both men involved were convicted of first-degree murder and indignity to a dead body and were sentenced as adults, with parole eligibility set after a decade in prison.
Why Parole Was Denied
The parole board cited a range of reasons for denying full parole to one of the convicted men, now 31 years old. Among the concerns were his ongoing contact with young women that he had not fully disclosed to his case management team, which parallels elements of his past offence cycle. The board also noted that drawings of a violent and sexually deviant nature were found in his cell, and that he has shown limited insight into the risks associated with deviant sexual fantasies. Psychologists assessing his case also concluded that his risk for both sexual and general violence remains high and not effectively manageable in the community without further treatment and stability.
History of Risk and Behaviour in Custody
Beyond the concerns about relationships and fantasies, correctional reports noted other troubling incidents in custody, including physical altercations with inmates and episodes of self-harm. These behaviours contributed to the board’s judgment that he has not made sufficient progress toward reducing the risk he presents. The parole board’s decision also referenced psychological evaluations that emphasize the need for continued treatment of deviant interests and improved emotional regulation before any conditional release can be considered.
Impact on Victims’ Family and Future Applications
Victim impact statements were included in the parole review, underscoring the deep and lasting trauma experienced by Proctor’s loved ones. These statements highlighted the ongoing grief and harm caused by the crime and reinforced the board’s finding that releasing him at this time would pose too great a risk. Because the parole board decision aligns with past denials of day parole and parole appeals, the convicted man will have to wait before making future applications, typically subject to parole board rules on timing and evidence of rehabilitation.
Stay updated instantly — follow us on Instagram | Facebook | X
